Thu, Apr 19, 2018
New Priorities at the SEC
Politicians are said to campaign in poetry but govern in prose. And so it is that for all the ambitious rhetoric of dismantling the Dodd-Frank Act the principal change to the regulatory regime under the new U.S. administration has been cultural rather than legislative. It may be no less profound for that, however.
Executive Summary
Apr 19, 2018
Too Much of a Good Thing?
Apr 18, 2018
Too Much Too Soon?
Apr 19, 2018
Cyber Risks Beyond Your Four Walls
Apr 19, 2018
Brexit: The Catalyst for Substance Over Style in Asset Management
Apr 19, 2018
A Reality Check
Apr 19, 2018
New Priorities at the SEC
Apr 19, 2018
The Consequences of Concentration in Private Equity
Apr 19, 2018
The SEC Looks to the Most Vulnerable
Apr 27, 2018
Client Protection at the Heart of MiFID II
Apr 19, 2018
The Paradise Papers: The Unreported Facts
Apr 19, 2018
What’s in a Name? It’s a Question Regulators Are Increasingly Asking
Apr 19, 2018
New Guidance From The Trump Administration Regarding FCPA Prosecutions
Apr 19, 2018
Lifting the Veil
Apr 19, 2018
A Fool’s Errand
Apr 19, 2018
Alternative Data Brings Different Problems
Apr 19, 2018
The Price of Everything but the Value of Nothing
Apr 19, 2018
Counting the Cost
Apr 19, 2018
A Big Step Towards Consistency in Fair Value
Apr 19, 2018
Finally Addressing Forgotten Assets
Apr 19, 2018
- View all articles
Read Global Regulatory Outlook 2018
In some respects, the approach of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) over the last year represents an evolution of its existing policy. That’s most evident in its commitment to transparency, which has only intensified in the last year.
The regulator now publishes not just its exam priorities at the start of each year1 but also an increasing number of risk alerts and notices on an almost continual basis, as well as seminars, webinars and other initiatives. Its intention is to be as clear as possible with those it regulates about its expectations.
As the director of the Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE), Peter Driscoll, put it in a speech to investment advisers in September: “[E]xaminations are not the only avenue for OCIE to fulfill its mission. As a means of improving and promoting compliance, OCIE has increasingly added outreach events as a way to educate and engage with the industry.”
The hope, he continued, was that increased transparency of OCIE’s priorities would enable firms to focus their internal compliance and “anticipate and pre-emptively solve common compliance issues.”2
But advisers should take note that greater transparency will require firms to proactively monitor and properly address these issues.
While the commitment to transparency regarding its priorities remains, the nature of the regulator’s priorities has changed. Under new leadership, the SEC has abandoned its “broken windows” policy brought in under former Chair Mary Jo White, which encouraged enforcement action for even fairly trivial compliance failures; “no infraction was too small.”3
In October, Steven Peikin, co-director of the SEC’s enforcement division, suggested the regulator was dropping that approach.4 In its place, new Chair Jay Clayton is focusing the agency on investor protection, particularly for retail investors. The new rule from the SEC is first, do no harm.
Combine that with the emphasis on transparency to pre-empt and avoid enforcement action, and this may well mean fewer cases in the future, as some have suggested.5
But it also means the SEC is, first, clearer than ever with its expectations, and, second, likely to come down hard where it sees real wrongs being done to investors. Firms that willfully or negligently fail to follow its guidance are unlikely to find the new regime has a light touch.
Sources:
1 https://www.sec.gov/ocie
2 https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/speech-driscoll-2017-09-14
3 https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/spch100913mjw
4 https://www.wsj.com/articles/sec-signals-pullback-from-prosecutorial-approach-to-enforcement-1509055200
5 https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/business/wp/2017/11/23/wall-streets-watchdog-is-pursuing-fewer-cases-since-trump-took-office/?utm_term=.7211e1807eae
Financial Services Compliance and Regulation
End-to-end governance, advisory and monitorship solutions to detect, mitigate, drive efficiencies and remediate operational, legal, compliance and regulatory risk.
Financial Crime Prevention
Financial crime risk has again risen to the top of the regulatory agenda, and remains one of the most immediate risks for many firms, with criminals constantly seeking new ways to circumvent protective controls.
U.S. Compliance Services
Comprehensive support for asset managers registering in the U.S.
European Compliance Services
Comprehensive compliance and regulatory support for EU firms.
French Regulation
A range of support from a review of your suitability arrangements, training, controls and procedures to conducting bespoke reviews on past business activities.
UK Compliance Services
Comprehensive compliance and regulatory support for FCA authorized firms.
Irish Regulation
Kroll is uniquely placed to assist firms in negotiating the regulatory landscape.
Singapore Regulation
Kroll's experienced team provides practical compliance and regulatory advice to financial institutions in Singapore.
Channel Islands Regulation
Kroll provides a range of regulatory and compliance consulting services for firms registered in the Channel Islands.
Regulatory Advice and Consulting Services
Assistance to develop, implement, and manage global compliance and regulatory consulting programs.