Tue, Nov 26, 2019

67% of Senior Leaders Within the Alternative Investments Industry Believe That Regulatory Bodies Are Not Doing Enough on ESG Regulation

London – Survey results released today by Duff & Phelps, the global adviser that protects, restores and maximizes value, shows that more than two thirds (67%) of senior leaders within the alternative investments industry think regulatory bodies are not doing enough regarding Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) regulation.
ESG governance considers a number of factors that determine the sustainability and ethical impact of an investment. As such, greater regulation of ESG investments could help ensure they meet the standards required, ranging from a company’s energy use to how much pollution it creates.

Ethical investors need to know that any claims made in these areas are accurate, since the ramifications of any unsubstantiated or misleading statements can be dire. For example, one third of those surveyed (33%) believe that environmental trends like resource scarcity from global warming will have the most disruptive effect on the economy.
Slightly fewer of those questioned (30%) felt that social changes such as the ageing population and changing consumer preferences would have the greatest impact on the economy, followed by political trends including Brexit and regulatory considerations (26%).

Commenting on the findings, Ryan McNelley, Managing Director, Portfolio Valuation at Duff & Phelps, said: “Given that so many senior people in the alternative investments space feel environmental and societal factors will be disruptive for the economy, it’s no surprise that most agree more regulation is needed to reduce potential greenwashing within the industry. At the moment, it’s still a bit of the wild west when it comes to how companies measure and market their ESG funds and how they report to their investors. Regulators and standards boards therefore need to consult with market participants across the industry and band together to lay out common standards in this area.” 
Many respondents felt that the qualitative nature of ESG data is hard to quantify without universal standards and regulation. Only 25% of respondents agreed that ESG factors could be consistently and reliably measured to evaluate their cost versus benefit to investors. By contrast, 75% of respondents disagreed or disagreed strongly with this sentiment.
Ryan McNelley concluded: “The financial sector can be a powerful actor in fighting climate change and helping to propel social justice. However, we need to quantify and create a generally accepted standard for the measurement of ESG factors within the industry if we are to assess their effectiveness and benefits to society.”

About Duff & Phelps
Duff & Phelps is the global advisor that protects, restores and maximizes value for clients in the areas of valuation, corporate finance, investigations, disputes, cyber security, compliance and regulatory matters, and other governance-related issues. We work with clients across diverse sectors, mitigating risk to assets, operations and people. With Kroll, a division of Duff & Phelps since 2018, our firm has nearly 3,500 professionals in 28 countries around the world. For more information, visit www.duffandphelps.com.

For further information contact:
Charlotte Webber 
[email protected]
07741 666706


Notes to editors
The data was collected from a survey conducted at the Duff & Phelps annual European Alternative Investment Conference which took place in London on November 7.

Valuation Advisory Services

Our valuation experts provide valuation services for financial reporting, tax, investment and risk management purposes.

Portfolio Valuation

Kroll specializes in assisting clients with the valuation of alternative investments, specifically securities and positions for which there are no "active market" quotations.

Alternative Asset Advisory

Heightened regulatory concerns and vigilance, together with increased investor scrutiny, have led to increased demand for independent expert advice.