Global Regulatory Outlook 2020

The Regulatory Landscape Evolves

Every year, Kroll surveys key stakeholders from a wide range of global financial institutions on the current regulatory landscape.

Top Line Findings
  • Almost two thirds (64%) of respondents say the current regulatory regime is effective in preventing financial crime
  • But 33% say they spend more than 5% of annual budgets on compliance
  • New York (56%) surges ahead of London (34%) as world’s preeminent financial center
  • But 30% say UK has the most favorable regulatory regime for financial services, ahead of New York (26%) and Singapore (18%)
  • The war for talent (24%) and cost of compliance (20%) biggest challenges facing financial businesses
  • Almost half (47%) say investor demand will drive environmental responsibility in the financial sector, against 25% for regulation



Study the natural landscape for any amount of time and you quickly become aware of the range of powers that have shaped it. From seismic action to gradual erosion and the daily wear of wind, waves and rain -- It is layer upon layer of never-ending change. And we never know for sure when the flood waters might come.

As it is with nature, so it is with regulatory environment. Each year, as part of its Global Regulatory Outlook, Kroll conducts an online survey of financial services executives around the world to get their views on issues that are shaping and changing the industry.  

This year’s outlook report reveals a landscape that is the product of historic failures, but also continued innovation and challenges. And it changes still.

At Peace With the World

We surveyed 240 senior executives working in financial services across banking, asset management, hedge funds, private equity, broker dealers and a range of other business. They come from the U.S., UK, Asia and a number of other jurisdictions. Seven out of ten work for organizations with operations in more than one country.

Overall, our findings suggest a level of acceptance of the current regulatory regime. Close to two-thirds say that the current regime is effective in preventing financial crime (64%), for example—at least when it comes to their own territory. Even though fewer (34%) are willing to vouch that it is effective on a global level, this is a vote of confidence, and all the more remarkable given that, as we’ll see, they are not blind to regulations’ faults.

Moreover, those territories named as having the most favorable regulatory regimes—notably the UK (30%) and U.S. (26%)—are among the most mature. There is also a strong home bias: executives were most likely to name their domestic jurisdiction as having the most favorable regime.

On these findings, those surveyed would seem relatively satisfied with the current regulatory regime.



Channel Islands Regulatory Calendar 2020

Feb 20, 2020

by Malin NilssonEd Shorrock


France Regulatory Calendar 2020

Feb 20, 2020

by Hannah Rossiter


Ireland Regulatory Calendar 2020

Feb 20, 2020


Luxembourg Regulatory Calendar 2020

Feb 20, 2020


Singapore Regulatory Calendar 2020

Feb 20, 2020

by Nicolas Inman


UK Regulatory Calendar 2020

Feb 20, 2020

by Ian Manson


U.S. Regulatory Calendar 2020

Feb 20, 2020

by Ken C. Joseph, Esq.Peter WilsonChris Lombardy


AML Policy and Brexit – A Quiet Revolution

May 20, 2020

by Maria Evstropova Julius Kania


When it comes to Illiquidity, Prevention is Better than Cure

Jul 14, 2020

by Hannah RossiterKen C. Joseph, Esq.


Complex Valuations: A Combination of Science and Judgement

Jul 28, 2020

by Mark Turner


A Growing Role for ManCos Post COVID-19?

Oct 23, 2020

Connect with us

Monique Melis
Monique Melis
Managing Director and Global Head of Financial Services Compliance and Regulation
Ken C. Joseph
Ken C. Joseph, Esq.
Managing Director
Financial Services Compliance and Regulation
New York

Stay Ahead with Kroll

Financial Services Compliance and Regulation

End-to-end governance, advisory and monitorship solutions to detect, mitigate, drive efficiencies and remediate operational, legal, compliance and regulatory risk.

Regulatory Advice and Consulting Services

Assistance to develop, implement, and manage global compliance and regulatory consulting programs.

Compliance Risk and Diligence

Complying with anti-money laundering and anti-bribery and corruption regulations.

Forensic Investigations and Intelligence

Providing clients with global investigative expertise to help make critical decisions and mitigate risk.

Cyber Risk

Incident response, digital forensics, breach notification, managed detection services, penetration testing, cyber assessments and advisory.


Forensic Investigations and Intelligence

Attorney Considerations Amid Rise of Tech-Enabled Investigations

Feb 07, 2023

by Jordan L. StraussHugo Hoyland


KAPE Quarterly Update – Q4 2022

Feb 06, 2023

by Eric ZimmermanAndrew Rathbun


Hive Ransomware Technical Analysis and Initial Access Discovery

Feb 02, 2023

by Stephen Green, Elio Biasiotto

Compliance Risk

Best Practice in a Time of Change for the Renewable Energy Market: Financial and Technical Due Diligence of Renewable Energy Assets

Feb 01, 2023

by Casper Wuite


KAPE Intensive Training and Certification

Apr 13, 2023 - The Cyber Risk practice of Kroll is excited to offer virtual sessions of the Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor (KAPE) Intensive Training and Certification.


Q4 2022 Threat Landscape Virtual Briefing: Tech. and Manufacturing Targeted As Ransomware Peaks for 2022

Feb 15, 2023